Mar 17, 2015 the supreme court today quashed the centres decision to include jats in the other backward classes obc category that made them eligible for reservations in jobs and educational institutions. Supreme court quashes decision to include jats in obc category, says caste cant be sole ground. Nariman significantly said new practices, methods and yardsticks have to be continuously evolved, moving away from castecentric definition of backwardness. Reservation in promotion honble supreme courts judgment is under consideration government of india ministry of personnel,public grievances and pensions rajya sabha question no 77 answered on 10. Supreme court judgement on obc quota academics india. Important judgments of sc and high courts with short. Court cases related to reservation in india wikipedia. All previous judgments handed down prior to this can be found on our decided cases section. Supreme court quashes extension of obc reservation to jats.
This site contains most of the written reasons for judgment, and reasons for sentencing of the yukon courts since january 2006. Recent judgment of supreme court says that states are not bound to provide quotas for scst or obc in government job and that there is no fundamental right to claim reservation in promotions. Triumph of individual liberty maneka gandhi vs uoi 1978. He said the government is studying the supreme court decision and will try. Judgments are also available in html format on the bailii website. Markio tado vs takam sorang section 116a of the representation of the peoples act. The supreme court today set aside the notification issued by the erstwhile upa government to include jats in the central list of. Important supreme court judgement with effect from 10. Decisions released since 2001 are being added as time and resources allow. The supreme court toppled an administration choice to give reservations to the jat people group in nine states by incorporating them in the central list of backward classes. Two changes which were made earlier by the 42nd amendment act were declared as null and void by the supreme court in this particular case. According to the petitioners, this reservation is without any valid and lawful basis. Sc verdict on jats reservation court verdict published. Supreme court in a landmark judgement has ruled out reservation in promotion for scst categories.
Shirpur education society through its principal vs. Thursdays is a landmark ruling since no caste reservation policy exceeding 50% has passed muster till now with the high courts or the sc. Judgments, supreme court of india indian employees. The punjab and haryana high court gave last chance to the haryana government on monday to clear its stand on the issue of reservation to jats and four other communities of the state given during. Senior counsel pradeep sancheti, appearing for an ngo, said the 2015 apex court judgment by a bench of justices ranjan gogoi now the chief justice of india and rohinton nariman, in the jat case. Nclat passed several judgements in 2019 but many of them failed supreme court perusal 02 jan, 2020, 06. Supreme court strikes down provisions of karnataka quota.
This honble court, in its judgment, quoted and relied on unamended provisions of the ipc relating to sexual offences. The ncbc also examined the claim for inclusion of jats in the central list. Supreme court of india division bench db two judge basir ahmed sisodiya versus the income tax officer appeal civil, 6110 of 2009, judgment date. Read synopsis of judgment and download all relevant documents below.
The supreme court today quashed the centres decision to include jats in the other backward classes obc category that made them eligible for. In a landmark verdict, the supreme court on tuesday told the government to look beyond caste and evolve new methods to identify social groups as backward for the purpose of reservation in jobs and education. Supreme court scraps reservation for jats india news india today. Hours after the courts judgment, 27 jat mps, cutting across party lines, led by union rural development minister chaudhury birender singh, met union finance. The case was pressed again in 1999 and the supreme court reaffirmed the creamy layer exclusion and extended it to scs and sts. However, it is apt to consider the judgment of supreme court reported in 2008 8 scc 469 state of punjab v. Maratha reservation policy upheld read the judgment. Feb 12, 2017 supreme court strikes down provisions of karnataka quota law on promotion in order to provide reservation in promotions, the states must first determine whether the criteria of inadequacy of representation, backwardness are fulfilled, the sc has said. Reservation for obcs in government jobs was introduced by the vp singh government in august 1990. The one paragraph from the supreme courts jat quota. Why did the supreme court cancel jat reservation in central. Important judgments of sc and high courts with short explanation. Striking down the previous upa governments decision to include the politically influential jat. The judgment ram singh vs union of india had created a huge political stir.
Hours after the courts judgment, 27 jat mps, cutting across party lines, led by union rural development minister chaudhury birender singh, met. In march 2015, the decision was rejected by the supreme court of india. It was also found that twelve per cent of jat children in the age of group of five. We saw several significant supreme court judgments in 2015. Supreme court quashes decision to include jats in obc category, says caste cant be sole ground the court said the centre gave a go by to the statutory scheme in according reservation benefits to a politically organised community. The punjab and haryana high court today referred the petition on the jat reservation to the backward commission. The jat reservation agitation was a series of violent protests in february 2016 by jat people of. In order to provide reservation in promotions, the states must first determine whether the criteria of inadequacy of representation, backwardness and overall efficiency are fulfilled, the supreme court has said. Union of india the supreme court of india in this case, examined the valid. The centres move came after the apex courts verdict on march 17 striking down the centres march 2014 notification that had put jats on the. The reservation pie the one paragraph from the supreme court s jat quota judgment that slams competitive backwardness recovering lost ground cant be reason enough to give reservations. Oct 06, 2018 important supreme court judgement with effect from 10. In this landmark judgment, the supreme court of india in 1980 strengthened the doctrine of the basic structure which was propounded earlier in the keshavananda bharti case.
The commission will have to submit its report by the end of march. This petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, is directed against the order annexure p2 dated 26. The supreme court on tuesday quashed the march 4, 2014 notification by the upa government extending obc reservation to jats in nine. Supreme court of india division bench db two judge dinesh kumar gupta and others versus high court of judicature of rajasthan others writ petition civil, 936 of 2018, judgment date. In this landmark judgment, the supreme court declared that the rights of citizens to move the court for violation of articles 14, 21 and 22 would remain suspended during emergencies. Below you will find the latest judgment s handed down by the uk supreme court. Murari lal gupta vs state of haryana and ors on 1 september, 2017. Jan 09, 2017 reservation was given to jat because any community which satisfies mandal commission criteria should get the reservation.
The haryana assembly passed a bill on tuesday to provide 10% reservation in government jobs and educational institutions to jats and five other castes in the state. Supreme court quashes decision to include jats in obc. Maratha quota challengers cite supreme court against jat. Mar 31, 2018 the punjab and haryana high court today referred the petition on the jat reservation to the backward commission. Reservation in promotion important supreme court judgement. News of future judgments given by the supreme court will appear on this page approximately a week in advance of the hand down date. Supreme court says no to quota for jats huffpost india. The supreme court wednesday said its 2006 verdict putting benefits of quotas in job promotions for scst employees need not be referred to a sevenjudge bench. Jan 24, 2017 the supreme court toppled an administration choice to give reservations to the jat people group in nine states by incorporating them in the central list of backward classes. Important supreme court judgement reservation in promotions. The supreme court is likely to deliver its judgment on tuesday on a batch of public interest litigations challenging the inclusion of jats in the central list of other backward classes obcs that. Why did the supreme court cancel jat reservation in. The court, drawing a somewhat fuzzy line between past and emerging forms of backwardness, advances the presumption of the progressive advancement of all citizens on all fronts, i. Deepak gulati vs state of haryana sections 365 and 376 of the indian penal code.
However, some states denied the existence of the creamy layer, and a report commissioned by the supreme court was not implemented. It was a political step and has rightly been recognized as one. Supreme court judgement on obc quota in education institutions. Government to find solution to jat quota issue within legal framework. For judgments handed down before 31 july 2009 please refer to the house of lords or bailii websites. It will further increase the quota in the state to 67%, which is impermissible in view of the 1992 supreme court judgment in the indira sawhney case mandal case prescribing a 50%. There should be no reservation in promotions supreme court. Mar 17, 2015 supreme court sets aside jat quota at centre. Reliance on unamended provisions resulted in failure to resolve the contradictions that section 377 poses to the amended provisions. Supreme court strikes down provisions of karnataka quota law. The court agrees with the navajo nation supreme courts holding that no person or entity may deny the navajo nations regulatory and adjudicatory jurisdiction on the basis of a violation of the nations laws.
The states appeal against the high court ruling is pending. Setting aside the notification extending the obc status to jats, the apex court slammed the centres decision to overlook the findings of an obc. On september 9, 2016, the supreme court had refused to stay a gujarat high court judgment quashing a 10 per cent reservation announced by the state government for the economically backward sections. Mar 18, 2015 supreme court quashes decision to include jats in obc category, says caste cant be sole ground. In its judgment on friday, the supreme court set aside the decision of the court of appeal, abuja division, delivered on. The supreme court refused to provide reservation for scheduled caste and scheduled tribes in the higher judiciary on monday as it turned down a plea of a districtlevel judge from uttarakhand who. Judgement implemented, with 27% central government reservation for obcs. The protestors sought inclusion of their caste in the other backward class obc category, which would make them eligible for affirmative action benefits. The supreme court today set aside the notification issued by the erstwhile upa government to. The handdown will be streamed on supreme court live and will then be made available on the supreme courts video on demand service. It was a clamorous day at lok sabha on monday as opposition parties targeted the government over recent supreme court judgement which rules that states are not legally bound to provide reservation. Laudable step by the supreme court to scrap jat reservation. P, guna removed the petitioner from service as a measure of punishment.
News of future judgments given by the supreme court will appear on this page approximately 1 day in advance of the hand down date. Reservation was given to jat because any community which satisfies mandal commission criteria should get the reservation. Supreme court judgments may 20 deepak gulati vs state of haryana sections 365 and 376 of the indian penal code samrendra beura vs u. Plaintiffs cannot claim that, by ignoring the nations laws, they have not consented to the nations jurisdiction. When with 1931 data we can have people considered as obc in 1980, then no logic justifies the exclusion of a. Supreme court cancels centres decision to grant reservation. Rahman khan will the minister of personnel,public grievances and pensions be pleased to satate.
The judgment of the supreme court is to be read in the context of inclusion of. Sc refuses to provide scst reservation in higher judiciary. Sc verdict on jats reservation court verdict published in. Jats already have reservations in a number of north indian states on their own lists, but the centre hadnt recognised them as backward until last. The one paragraph from the supreme courts jat quota judgment. The supreme court on tuesday quashed the march 4, 2014 notification by the upa. The supreme court today quashed the centres decision to include jats in the other backward classes obc category that made them eligible for reservations in jobs and educational institutions. Due to the coronavirus covid19 pandemic, the supreme court building is closed to the public and judgments are being handeddown remotely via webbased technology. The sc had in its mandal verdict in 1992 upheld the policy but put a 50% ceiling on it and asked the government to ensure the exclusion of rich people, or the socalled creamy layer.
For all the latest india news, download indian express app. Section 66a of the information technology act held unconstitutional shreya singhal v. The apex court set aside provisions of the karnataka determination of seniority of the government servants promoted on the basis of reservation to the posts in the. Dec 06, 2017 important supreme court judgement with effect from 10. Reservation in promotions should be roster point based total number of posts should be the basis for working out number of post to be earmarked for each category in the caste wise reservation roster and not vacancy based. On may 26, 2016, the punjab and haryana high court ruled out against the bill. The jat reservation agitation was a series of violent protests in february 2016 by jat people of north india, especially those in the state of haryana, which paralysed the state for 10 days.
335 84 1188 715 370 191 1239 1069 529 94 79 1192 115 1629 510 804 995 410 1009 1394 1445 582 1195 1126 603 1592 1301 575 868 399 95 1190 507 1193 741 1295 959 727 1582 284 314 415 538 93 508 782 649